The data below are the 'raw' extracts from the documents and/or papers. Please refer to the last column for the reference and obtain the full text if required. Please also let me know if there are any mistakes here. |
No
|
Data
|
|
1
|
Brazil,
niobium mining and processing
Effluent treatment was generally efficient to reduce radionuclide releases to the environment, with the exception of one niobium industry that had to include an additional step (precipitation with sulphate) to remove Ra-228 (in concentrations up to 5 Bq/l) from seepage water in its tailings dam. The predicted effective doses to the hypothetical critical groups are below 0.3 mSv/year. |
F-01
|
2
|
Brazil,
niobium mining and processing
Open pit processing, Activity Median Aerodynamic Diameter (AMAD) + 1 micron, bioassay results were typically below minimum detection level but uranium was detected for some occupations (processing). Dose: open pit - 1.3 mSv/yr, leaching - 1.2 mSv/yr, other areas - 0.2-0.8 mSv/yr. |
L-01
|
3
|
European
Union, niobium processing
Ferro-niobium production, raw material - pyrochlore or columbite ~ 50 Bq/g Th |
J-02
|
4
|
European Union, niobium production |
D-02
|
5
|
Brazil, niobium processing |
P-04
|
9
|
Russia,
niobium and tantalum production |
S-13
|
10
|
EU Very high radionuclide concentrations occur in pyrochlore, the source of niobium, and this is reflected in the products and the wastes. Assessments of the radiological impact of operations associated with metal smelting generally indicate that worker doses are low, with the exception of those from pyrochlore where values of up to a few mSv/yr are possible. Exposure of the public owing to releases from these processes is generally assessed to be low. However, the potential doses from landfill disposal of waste could be more significant, where values up to 10 mSv/yr could occur as a result of intrusion and site redevelopment. |
E-08
|